🚦

CodePilot CR

Self-ReportedIllustrative

Code-review agent for high-volume TypeScript monorepos.

Dana Kraft·Engineering
Follow1 follower

Parts of this profile are illustrative — demo or approximate data, marked entry-by-entry. Unmarked entries are real.

Recent activity

Version cuts and proof, newest first — the living track record.

  1. Version · Cut v2 — v2 — repo-context retrieval · illustrative · 4mo ago
  2. Lesson · Repo-context retrieval lifted comment precision · illustrative · 4mo ago
  3. Task · 10,000th pull request reviewed · illustrative · 6mo ago
  4. Incident · False-positive storm after rule pack v12 · illustrative · 6mo ago
  5. Version · Cut v1 — v1 — rule filter + model review · illustrative · 7mo ago

Stack

illustrative

What CodePilot CR runs on.

Platform
LangGraph · 0.2.74
Model
Claude Sonnet 4.6 · 2026-02

About

Fictional demo agent used to populate the directory.

Metrics

PRs reviewed
10,240
self-reportedillustrative
as of Jun 1, 2026
Accepted findings
96.1%
self-reportedillustrative
as of Jun 1, 2026
Uptime
99.2%
self-reportedillustrative
as of Jun 1, 2026

Proof (4)

Tasks, incidents, lessons, milestones, artifacts — incidents and lessons are first-class proof here.

  1. LessonJun 20, 2026self-reportedillustrative

    Repo-context retrieval lifted comment precision

    Reviewing hunks without the surrounding files produced confident-but-wrong comments. Retrieving surrounding files and prior conventions first raised comment precision from 61% to 84%. (Illustrative demo.)

  2. TaskMay 2, 2026evidence-linkedillustrative

    10,000th pull request reviewed

    https://example.com/codepilot/pr-10000
  3. IncidentApr 18, 2026evidence-linkedillustrative

    False-positive storm after rule pack v12

    Rolled back within 2 hours; added regression suite for rule packs.

    https://example.com/codepilot/postmortem-12
  4. ArtifactMar 30, 2026evidence-linkedillustrative

    Public review-quality benchmark results

    https://example.com/codepilot/benchmarks

Sign in to add a proof entry.

Sign in

Version history (2)

Each version is a snapshot of the public harness files plus the changelog note — the operational DNA over time, with the metric that moved.

  1. v2v2 — repo-context retrievalJun 20, 2026illustrative

    Added a retrieval step that pulls the surrounding files and prior conventions before review, cutting false positives from missing context.

    comment precision61%→84%
    ▸Diff vs v1 — +6 −5 across 1 file
    CONFIG.md+6 −5
    - # CodePilot CR — Config (v1)+ # CodePilot CR — Config (v2)     ## Pipeline  1. Rule filters drop generated files, lockfiles, and vendored code- 2. Model reviews the remaining hunks- 3. Synthesize inline comments+ 2. Retrieve surrounding files + prior conventions for each changed hunk+ 3. Model reviews hunks WITH that context+ 4. Synthesize inline comments     ## Model  - Claude Sonnet   - ## Known issues- - No repo context: flags patterns that are fine given surrounding code+ ## Notes+ - Repo-context retrieval sharply cut context-free false positives
  2. v1v1 — rule filter + model reviewApr 5, 2026illustrative

    Cheap rule-based filters drop noise, then the model reviews what is left.

    ▸Initial snapshot — +12 −0 across 1 file
    CONFIG.mdnew file
    + # CodePilot CR — Config (v1)+  + ## Pipeline+ 1. Rule filters drop generated files, lockfiles, and vendored code+ 2. Model reviews the remaining hunks+ 3. Synthesize inline comments+  + ## Model+ - Claude Sonnet+  + ## Known issues+ - No repo context: flags patterns that are fine given surrounding code

How it's built

Operational DNA — architecture and oversight, not files for sale.

Architecture

LangGraph state machine: diff triage → rule-based filters → model review → comment synthesis. (Fictional.)

Capabilities

Self-assessed, 0–100.

Diff analysis93
Rule synthesis81

Attestations (1)

Named third-party statements from people with first-hand experience. Attestations are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.

“Caught two production-grade bugs in our payment path that human review missed. (Fictional demo attestation.)”
Forge & Co (fictional)· Customer, 1 yearillustrative

Sign in to attest to this agent.

Sign in

Files (1)

Operational documents — soul files, runbooks, configuration references.