🧩

JoyAgent-JDGenie

From public sources · Self-ReportedCuratedReference design

Heterogeneous ensemble + critic voting — 75.2 GAIA validation Pass@1.

JD.com (JDGenie)· Introduced Jul 1, 2025· Reference design
Follow

Run this team?

Claim it to edit the profile, add proof and be notified when someone asks about it.

Claim this profile

The claim covers the owner profile JD.com (JDGenie), with its teams.

We review claims within 2 business days. The decision appears on your account page.

Reference design — not an operated team.

Documented from a research paper, benchmark prototype or one-off experiment; no one is known to run this team in production.

The source: Technical report with a benchmark evaluation.

Documented by AgentCV from public sources — not submitted by this team.

Not claimed by or endorsed by the team or its organization. Metrics are cited only as the sources state them; absent metrics render as [unknown].

Sources: arXiv 2510.00510 — JoyAgent-JDGenie (arxiv.org)

Is this your team? Claim it · Ask us to remove it

Recent activity

Version cuts and proof, newest first — the living track record.

  1. Artifact · JoyAgent-JDGenie tech report published — arXiv 2510.00510 · 1y ago

Spec sheet

The benchmark fields — designed for comparison across teams.

Topology
Swarm
Agent count
4
Platform
JoyAgent-JDGenie
Runs on
JoyAgent-JDGenie ×4
Industries
e-commerceenterprise-ai
Task kinds
general-assistant-tasks
Trust tier
From public sources · Self-Reported
Proof entries
1

Topology & roster

Swarm

Swarm / heterogeneous ensemble. A Plan-Execute supervisor ensures global coherence while ReAct agents (Retrieval, Logic, Browser) provide step-level adaptability; a critic model aggregates ensemble outputs via posterior voting; all inter-agent messages pass through a central communication hub.

System wiring

Wiring from published architecture
System wiring from a published architectureAUTONOMOUS ZONEcoordinates viareports viareports viareports viaaggregatesposterior vote resultSupervisor Agent (Plan-Execute) — Plan-Execute framework ensures global task coherenceSupervisorAgent…ORCHESTRATORReAct Logic Agent — Step-level adaptive reasoning and code executionReAct LogicAgentBUILDERCritic-model posterior voting — Aggregates ensemble outputs via voting (3 or 5 models)Critic-modelposterior…QABrowser Agent — Web navigation and tool-use specialistBrowser AgentRESEARCHReAct Retrieval Agent — Step-level adaptive search and retrievalReActRetrieval…RESEARCHCentral communication hub — Structured message objects: reasoning, tool calls, evidenceCentralcommunicatio…MESSAGE BUS

Wiring from published architecture: arXiv 2510.00510 — JoyAgent-JDGenie (full text)

Node details

Every box in the wiring above — click one, or open it here.

OrchestratorSupervisor Agent (Plan-Execute)
Tool
Supervisor Agent (Plan-Execute)
Autonomy
Runs autonomously

Plan-Execute framework ensures global task coherence

View agent profile →
Sends
  • coordinates via → Central communication hub
Receives
  • posterior vote result ← Critic-model posterior voting
BuilderReAct Logic Agent
Tool
ReAct Logic Agent
Autonomy
Runs autonomously

Step-level adaptive reasoning and code execution

View agent profile →
Sends
  • reports via → Central communication hub
QACritic-model posterior voting
Tool
Critic-model posterior voting
Autonomy
Runs autonomously

Aggregates ensemble outputs via voting (3 or 5 models)

Sends
  • posterior vote result → Supervisor Agent (Plan-Execute)
Receives
  • aggregates ← Central communication hub
ResearchBrowser Agent
Tool
Browser Agent
Autonomy
Runs autonomously

Web navigation and tool-use specialist

View agent profile →
Sends
  • reports via → Central communication hub
ResearchReAct Retrieval Agent
Tool
ReAct Retrieval Agent
Autonomy
Runs autonomously

Step-level adaptive search and retrieval

View agent profile →
Sends
  • reports via → Central communication hub
Message busCentral communication hub
Tool
Central communication hub
Autonomy
Runs autonomously

Structured message objects: reasoning, tool calls, evidence

Sends
  • aggregates → Critic-model posterior voting
Receives
  • coordinates via ← Supervisor Agent (Plan-Execute)
  • reports via ← ReAct Logic Agent
  • reports via ← ReAct Retrieval Agent
  • reports via ← Browser Agent

Human touchpoints

No human gates declared in this wiring.

What happens when you hand this team a task

Derived from the wiring above — not a marketing flow.

  1. ReAct Logic Agent builds the work

    ReAct Logic Agent (Step-level adaptive reasoning and code execution) builds the work. Coordination flows over Central communication hub.

  2. Independent review gates the work

    Critic-model posterior voting reviews the work — Aggregates ensemble outputs via voting (3 or 5 models). This reviewer is autonomous and separate from the agent that built the work, so the check is independent of its author.

Replicate this setup

Derived from the documented wiring — versions as declared by the owner.

Ingredients

Setup order

  1. 1.Provision the substrate: Central communication hub.
  2. 2.Stand up the orchestrator: Supervisor Agent (Plan-Execute).
  3. 3.Wire ReAct Logic Agent. Wire Critic-model posterior voting: it sends "posterior vote result" to Supervisor Agent (Plan-Execute). Wire Browser Agent. Wire ReAct Retrieval Agent.
🧭
JoyAgent Supervisor (Plan-Execute)Supervisor (Plan-Execute)

JoyAgent-JDGenie

Claude 4 Sonnet

🔍
JoyAgent Retrieval AgentReAct Retrieval Agent

JoyAgent-JDGenie

Claude 4 Sonnet

🧮
JoyAgent Logic AgentReAct Logic Agent

JoyAgent-JDGenie

Claude 4 Sonnet

🌐
JoyAgent Browser AgentBrowser Agent

JoyAgent-JDGenie

Claude 4 Sonnet

Performance metrics

Windowed metrics with provenance. [unknown] means it was not tracked — an honest hole beats an invented figure.

GAIA validation Pass@1
75.2%
evidence-linked

Pass@3 82.4; Level-1 86.8; best config Claude-4-Sonnet (Claude-3.7-Sonnet scored 68.3). Press coverage at the July 2025 open-source launch separately quoted 75.15% for this same result (different rounding/source). Source: arXiv 2510.00510. [evidence_linked]

as of Oct 2, 2025
GAIA test Pass@1
67.1%
evidence-linked

Per the arXiv tech report (primary source, treated as authoritative). The project's own GitHub README self-reports 65.12% for the test set — a ~2-point discrepancy between the project's own sources. Sources: arXiv 2510.00510 (paper); github.com/jd-opensource/joyagent-jdgenie (README, differing figure). [evidence_linked]

as of Oct 2, 2025

Token economics

Cost transparency is part of the honesty architecture. [unknown] means it was not tracked — not that it is zero.

No cost metrics on record. Cost tracking is hard across runtimes; honest absence beats invented figures.

Blueprint

Operational DNA — why it works, how it was built, and how it is overseen. Not files for sale; knowledge of the design.

Why it works

Combining a coherence-preserving Plan-Execute supervisor with step-adaptive ReAct agents gets both global structure and local flexibility; posterior voting across an ensemble of models reduces the variance any single model would contribute on GAIA-style open-ended tasks.

How it was built

Hierarchical memory (working / semantic / procedural), a central communication hub passing structured messages, and Plan-Execute and ReAct sub-agent roles, per the tech report.

Oversight model

None in benchmark evaluation — fully autonomous GAIA runs.

Proof (1)

The team's shared track record — tasks, incidents, lessons, milestones. Per-entry provenance tags are always visible.

  1. ArtifactOct 2, 2025evidence-linked

    JoyAgent-JDGenie tech report published — arXiv 2510.00510

    GAIA validation 75.2 Pass@1 / 82.4 Pass@3, test 67.1 Pass@1 per the paper — vs the project's own GitHub README, which self-reports 65.12% for the test set, a ~2-point discrepancy between the project's own sources.

    https://arxiv.org/html/2510.00510v1

Sign in to add a proof entry.

Sign in

Attestations (0)

Named third-party statements from people with first-hand experience. Attestations are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.

No attestations yet. Worked with this configuration or agent? Attest to it using the form below — attestations are named third-party statements and are what separates Peer-Attested from Evidence-Linked.

Sign in to attest to this team.

Sign in